Do you want to receive a personal quotation?
Fill in our online consultation form and we will contact you.
Natural-looking transplantation results - a combination of different factors
The objective of any hair transplant is to achieve a natural-looking result. This is not just a question of knowing and applying an improved technique - there are a number of different factors needing to be taken into account.
- The starting point for any hair transplant is an analysis of the patient's situation, taking into account his or her hair loss pattern.
- The natural hair pattern, individual to each and every one of us, is not the only aspect needing to be understood. The (aesthetic) relationships between the individual areas of hair and the face as a whole also play a major role in achieving a natural-looking transplantation result.
- Hairlines with an aesthetic and harmonious look always match the face, its natural contours and a patient's natural circumstances. This is why it is crucial to take fundamental account of these decisive criteria.
- It is not just the human body which changes over the course in time, but also hair and the hairline. To obtain a natural-looking result it therefore is essential to pay attention to a patient's age, planning a matching hairline and taking into account any future age-related hair loss.
- No two people have the same hair - as is evident at first glance. Hair characteristics range from thin to thick, from straight to curly hair. There are also differences in hair density needing to be taken into account when transplanting hair.
- A patient's ethnic origin must be considered right from the start of any therapy planning, because a Caucasian hairline differs for example from an African or Asian one. Not taking such characteristics into account leads to an unnatural-looking result.
- The natural hairlines of men and women also differ. Whereas the female hairline is generally m-shaped, men tend to have a v-shaped one.
History of hair transplants
History of hair transplantation: from the first hair extraction to state-of-the-art standardsAccording to reports, the first attempts to transplant human and animal hair were made in the 18th/19th century, though it is difficult to find any evidence of results. The first own-hair transplants were performed in the 1940s in Japan on people suffering from burn wounds incurred during the Second World War. However no documentation of these operations exists. Smaller strips of the scalp were gouged out using the punch technique and transplanted to other places of the body, for example the eyebrows, the scalp or the moustache. The transplanted hairs rooted successfully and carried on growing.
Also in Japan, a first hair transplant took place in 1943 using small grafts. These micro-grafts contained 1 - 3 hairs and were only implanted in female patients. Due to the Second World War, this hair transplant was for a long period only known in Japan. In the Western world, the first own-hair transplantation was performed in the late 1960's. A New York publication describes the extraction of hair follicles from the tonsure and their successful transplantation, with the transplanted hair rooting and growing well and with hardly any hair loss.
The technique used up till the early 1980s was known as "standard punch grafting". This involved a round patch of hair being removed from the scalp using a cylinder. The graft often contained 20 - 30 hairs. Individual grafts were about 4 mm in diameter and only 50 - 100 grafts could be transplanted in one treatment session.
Successful only to a certain extent - standard punch grafting
Example of patient with ‘punch grafts’ from a previous surgery (performed ex domo)
Due to their size and the necessity of providing each graft with its own adequate blood supply, enough room had to be left between the implanted grafts. This led to the implant area looking like a doll's head with an unnatural hairline. A further problem involved the excessive damage caused to the donor area, with the back of the head, the main donor area, often looking like a scarred chess-board.
Example of patient with severe scarring from previous surgeries (performed ex domo)
To compensate as much as possible for the unnatural appearance, the gaps between the individual grafts were then filled in during further treatment sessions. These time-consuming and repeated treatment sessions did not always fulfil expectations, and patients were often disappointed with the results. For many patients there was a further undesirable effect - the further age-related hair loss / baldness progressed, the more visible the transplanted "hair islands" became, giving the head a completely unnatural look. Hair restoration surgeons therefore started taking natural hair loss into account when planning hair transplantation. The standard-punch-grafting method is now totally outdated and not used any more. Even so, many people still suffer from the unnatural appearance and the scars caused by this method, erroneously thinking that this method remains in common use.
Minigrafts & micrografts - a new combined method gains the upper hand
Example of patient with ‘micrografts’ from a previous surgery (performed ex domo)
In the late 1980's and early 1990's, so-called mini- and micro-grafts were developed. In contrast to the previously used method, this involved taking from the scalp a contiguous strip. All that was left after removal was a very narrow, linear scar instead of many relatively large scars. This strip of skin was then divided up into different-sized implants, allowing the hair surgeon to form a more natural hairline through combining different sizes of grafts. Smaller grafts lead to smaller wounds, meaning that more transplantation could take place in a single session, and with implants closer together. Mini-grafts contained 4 - 12 hair follicles, whilst micro-grafts only had 1 - 4 follicles. However, in the course of preparing the grafts for transplantation, many follicles were unnecessarily damaged, making them unusable. The situation changed in the late 1990's, with high-resolution microscopes being increasingly found in hair restoration surgeries. The high resolution and accuracy of these microscopes led to the discovery of the fact that hairs do not grow individually but in bunches or units of 1 - 4 follicles. These bunches are known as follicular units, and new transplantation methods are based on them, as they allow a natural-looking result to be achieved.
Follicular Unit Transplantation, or FUT for short, became the new standard in the field of hair transplantation in the early and mid-1990s. Using the FUT method, a narrow strip of skin is taken from the back of a patient's head. The individual hairs and hair bundles are then extracted from this strip and transplanted to previously determined places on the scalp. This means that a great number of grafts can be transplanted during any one session, with a natural and aesthetic hair growth pattern being achieved.
FUE – FUT: setting new standards in hair surgery
In 2003, the first FUE surgery was presented. After initial problems had been overcome, FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) soon became established as an extraction method on a par with FUT. Both FUE and FUT provide the opportunity of extracting individual FUs and transplanting these to the target areas in an aesthetic and harmonious manner. In a FUT transplantation, anything up to 5000 - 6000 FUs can be transplanted. The corresponding figure for the FUE method is about 3500 FUs. Which extraction method is better depends on each patient and needs to be weighed up once an examination has been performed.
Since the first hair transplants took place, hair extraction and transplantation methods have been perfected. Sound knowledge about natural hairlines and hair patterns has contributed greatly to transplantation results looking increasingly natural. For properly selected patients, all that is now often needed is a longer treatment session, as grafts can now - in contrast to the early days of hair transplantation - be implanted in greater density. A further advantage is the ability to perform coronal and sagittal incisions at the right time and at the right place, thereby generally causing less scarring. Improved survival chances of extracted FUs and obviously the experience gained over the last 15 years with these new techniques have led to the development of extremely advantageous know-how about the fundamental principles governing naturalness and hair density. Such knowledge positively influences decision-making processes and the results of any hair transplant - thereby boosting patient satisfaction and well-being.
For the good of the patient: continual development and permanent improvement
Do you want to receive a personal quotation?
Do you have any questions?
Please send us an email, and we will contact you as soon as possible.
Any questions about hair transplants, techniques, pricing, etc. Check our online FAQ database first.FAQ